2009 (11) TMI 940
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....GA For the Respondent: Sri A Satyanarayan, Adv. JUDGMENT SHYLENDRA KUMAR J. There is delay of 33 days in preferring this appeal which is sought of condonation in Misc. W.No. 9574/2009 and a further application Misc. W. No. 9575/2009 for stay. 2. Appeal by the state under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, against only that part of the order dated 09.07.2009 passed by the l....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by this Court and it is not as though he was remiss or negligent etc. 4. Petitioner in the writ petition id represented by Satyanarayan, Satyanarayan, learned Counsel for the respondent-assessee submits that the learned Single judge has very justifiable levied cost and the matter of this nature does not warrant interference in a writ appeal. 5. While wherein, even therefore an appeal of th....
TaxTMI