2007 (11) TMI 178

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....G. Denim Ltd.(KGDL) are related persons for the purpose of valuation under section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (the Act). During the period July, 2000 to June 2001, KGNM manufactured cotton yarn on job work basis for KGDL They paid duty on the goods manufactured on job work basis following the formula prescribed by the Apex Court in the case of Ujagar Prints v. Union of India reported in [1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anufacture and returned to the principal manufacturer in working out the assessable value. 4. The Ld. Consultant for the appellants strenuously argued before us that the impugned demand had been made without an enabling proposal in the show cause notice. Therefore, the impugned order was liable to be set aside. 5. The Ld. SDR reiterates the reasoning contained in the impugned order. He does not ....