Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 1209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3 and arises out of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 22.05.2009 in ITA 3728/Del/2008. The only issue sought to be raised by the revenue is with regard to the deletion of the addition in respect of the share application money to the extent of Rs?81,40,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer had made an addition of Rs. 88,40,000/- under the said....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te Limited towards share application money was treated as unexplained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the addition to that extent was sustained. However, in respect of the share application money to the extent of Rs. 81,40,000/- received from other parties, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the said addition because of the fact that the assessee had filed confirmatio....