2016 (5) TMI 840

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER PER : M.V. RAVINDRAN This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. AKP/NSK/49/2011 dated 28.2.2011. 2. None appeared on behalf of the appellant. Since the appeal is of 2011, I take up the appeal for disposal in the absence of any representation from the appellant-assessee. 3. The issue in short in this case is regarding penalty imposed on the appellant on the provisions of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e interest paid and were also seeking penalty. Both the authorities imposed penalty of equivalent amount. 3. Learned D.R. draws my attention to the facts of the case and also to the contravention which has sought to be charged against the appellant. He would submit that the penalty has been correctly imposed. To support his contention he submits the following case laws:- (a) Mahindra &....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....department and has also paid interest. I find from the records the first appellate authority in the impugned order had in para 11 categorically recorded that the appellant had been filing regular returns with the authorities and was mentioning the production/clearance of both dutiable and exempted goods with value, duty payable, Notification No. and also the details of CENVAT credit availed and ut....