2007 (10) TMI 150
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ncing the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 76 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 from Rs. 100/- only to Rs. 48,010/- being amount of service tax involved. 2. It has been held that, the appellant was liable to pay appropriate penalty for the delay in payment of service tax for a period of 517 days. Therefore, @ Rs. 100/- per day, the amount would exceed the service tax of Rs. 48,0....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in such a situation. 4. It appears from the record that, the appellant's Sole Proprietor had sent a letter dated 23-11-2006 to the Commissioner, in which it was categorically stated that, the show cause notice was received in the office of the appellant in the evening of 22-11-2006. It was further stated that, the appellant was not well and was undergoing medical treatment. It was also submitted ....