Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 150

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the order of the Commissioner enhancing the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 76 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 from Rs. 100/- only to Rs. 48,010/- being amount of service tax involved. 2. It has been held that, the appellant was liable to pay appropriate penalty for the delay in payment of service tax for a period of 517 days. Therefore, @ Rs. 100/- per day, the amount wou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion 80 of the Act could not be granted in such a situation. 4. It appears from the record that, the appellant's Sole Proprietor had sent a letter dated 23-11-2006 to the Commissioner, in which it was categorically stated that, the show cause notice was received in the office of the appellant in the evening of 22-11-2006. It was further stated that, the appellant was not well and was undergoing ....