2007 (10) TMI 646

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Representative (SDR) for the Respondent ORDER Per : Shri M. V. Ravindran, Member (Judicial) This appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal No.SVS/236/NGP-B/2006 dt. 8.8.2006. 2.Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the records. The issue involved in this case is regarding the denial of modvat credit to the appellant on the ground that they have availed cenvat c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi as reported at [2003 (153) E.L.T. 114 (Tri.Del.)]. The ratio of the decision of R.S. Industries is as under:- "We have considered the submissions of both the sides. The Revenue has not challenged the findings contained in the impugned order to the effect that the allegation of non-receipt of goods by the Appellants has not been establish....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....recovery of Credit taken on account of error, omission or misconstruction on the paret of officer or manufacturer or an assessee. As far as the appellants are concerned there was neither any error nor any misconstruction on their part. We also do not find any substance in the submission of the learned SDR that larger period of limitation will be invokable irrespective of the fact that fraud has no....