Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1996 (2) TMI 563

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to as "the Corporation"). Disciplinary proceedings were initiated againsr him on charges of misconduct and after conducting an inquiry wherein the charges were found proved, the petitioner was removed from service by order dated 17-4-1985. The said removal from service of the petitioner gave rise to an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Gorakhpur. Before the Labour Court, it was contended on behalf of the petitioner that the domestic inquiry was not fair and proper. The said plea of the petitioner was accepted by the Labour Court and the Corporation was permitted to adduce evidence to prove the charges. The Corporation adduced evidence, documentary as well as oral, in support of the charges....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....covered from the 23 passengers, who had boarded the bus at Basti, ₹ 5.35 per head, the prescribed fare for travelling from Basti to Gorakhpur but in the. waybill he had entered as having received the sum of ₹ 2.35 from each of them. Subsequently the said figure would have been altered from ₹ 2.35 to ₹ 2.85, which was the fare from Khalilabad to Gorakhpur and the petitioner would have retained the balance amount of ₹ 2.50 per passenger. On earlier occasions also the petitioner had adopted the same modus operandi and in the previous waybills prepared by the petitioner there was overwriting and the figure '3' had been changed to '8' and the fare amount of ₹ 2.35 had been altered to ₹ 2.....