AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (4) TMI 681
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER Per P. M. Saleem The Appellant herein M/s Abaj Electronics Pvt. Ltd is engaged in trading of LED TVs and had imported a consignment of LED TVs and filed a Bill of Entry No.7199250 dt.28.10.2014 through their authorized Customs Broker Agent i.e. M/s D.P. Logistics Pvt. Ltd for clearance of the said goods. The goods were covered under clearance on the basis of MRP value. The importer....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....earance of the goods. However, the learned Additional Commissioner of Customs, vide impugned Order-in-Original, not only confirmed the demand of the differential duty alongwith interest, but also confiscated the goods with an option to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 22 lakhs and also imposed penalty of Rs. 6,55,682.00 under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. The learned C....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....RP. As the onus of declaration of correct MRP is on the importer, it amouns to mis-declaration of the goods and therefore, seizure and confiscation of the goods are legally correct and appropriate. He therefore, strongly contends that the redemption fine and the penalty should be sustained. 4. On perusal of the records and after considering the contentions of both the sides, it is clear that th....