Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 479

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aw:- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case in law Appellate Tribunal has erred in deleting addition of Rs. 17192996/- which was made by the Assessing Officer on the basis of voluntarily disclosure made by the assessee in his statement, recorded on oath during the course of survey proceedings and given by the assessee after verification of his books of accounts and duly concerned with his Chartered Accountant?" 2. The assessment year is 2007-08 and the relevant accounting period is 1.4.2006 to 31.3.2007. The assessee is assessed as an individual. The department conducted a survey of his group concerns on 2.2.2007. During the course of survey, the assessee's statement came to be recorded under section 133A(3)(iii) of the Act ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....impounded material being Annexure BF-1 to BF-10 did not indicate earning of unaccounted income of assessee of Rs. 3,12,00,000/-. The impounded material only disclosed earning of additional income to the tune of Rs. 1,43,68,982/-. That out of such income of Rs. 1,43,68,982/- indicated by the impounded materials, a sum of Rs. 42,15,000/- had been shown as income of Vimal Poddar (HUF) and the balance amount of Rs. 1,04,11,752/- had been shown by the assessee in his return of income. It was the case of the assessee that during the course of survey proceedings the officers had shown seized material which disclosed income out of transactions to the tune of Rs. 2,85,00,000/- and under this impression, at the time of survey, without proper analysis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mitted that the Assessing Officer had rightly held that the unaccounted income was to the tune of Rs. 3,12,00,000/-, as disclosed by the assessee during the course of survey, and was, therefore, justified in making addition of Rs. 1,71,92,996/- accordingly. It was submitted that the disclosure made by the assessee being voluntary, the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal were not justified in setting aside the addition made by the Assessing Officer. 5. The facts are not in dispute. During the course of survey, the assessee had made a statement under section 133A(3)(iii) of the Act declaring the undisclosed income of all group concerns to be Rs. 3,12,00,000/-. However, subsequently upon ascertaining from the impounded material, the asses....