Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (12) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Rules framed thereunder, no proceedings could continue as there is no saving clause made by the Finance Act, 2001, which omitted Section 3-A of the Act. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the process of man made fabrics with the aid of power and steam. During the period from December 1998 to November 1999, the appellants were working under the Compounded Levy Scheme which was framed under Section 3-A of the Act and Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for brevity "the Rules"). Accordingly, the capacity of the appellants was determined and duty liability was fixed on the basis of size of stenter machine. The revenue had consistently taken the view that the P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Thereafter, additional show cause notices incorporating the ground of recovering the duty from the custom were served and it was proposed to be rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment (Annexure R-3 and R-4). 3. The appellants filed their replies to the show cause notices and took the plea that no ground for rejection of their claim for refund was available as the decision delivered by the Tribunal holding that the length of galleries is not includable for determining annual capacity had already attained finality upto Supreme Court. They had not recovered the excise duty amount from their customer and therefore, the principles of unjust enrichment was not applicable. The adjudicating authority vide order 30.12.2003 sanctioned both the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ions of Section 38-A reads thus : "Section 38.A (Effect of amendments, etc. of rules, notifications or orders - Where any rule, notification or order made or issued under this Act or any Notification or order issued under such rule, is amended, repealed, superseded or rescinded, then, unless a different intention appears, such amendment, repeal, supersession or rescinding shall not - (a) revive anything not in force or existing at the time at which the amendment, repeal, supersession or rescinding takes effect; or (b) affect the previous operation of any rule, notification or order so amended, repealed, superseded or rescinded or anything duly done or suffered thereunder; or (c ) affect any right, privilege, obligation or liability acqu....