Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent : Shri K. Poddar, Authorized Representative (DR) ORDER PER. B. RAVICHANDRAN :- The appellant is a Customs Broker having a licence to attend to customs clearance work in the ports. Certain enquiries were conducted by the officers of Customs Commissionerate, New Delhi with reference to import of Synthetic Diamond Powder in June 2011 by M/s New Faith Enterprises, New Delhi. Certai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Diamond by M/s New Faith Enterprises, wherein the contents were declared in terms of 1 kg. is = 1000 carats instead of 1 kg. = 5,000 carats. The second violation alleged was with reference to bill of entry dated 17/1/12 for consignment of memory cards which were actually found to be RAMs. 2. Apart from strongly contesting the impugned order on merits the learned Counsel for appellant contended th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....014 and 25/6/2013. The date of offence report received by the Original Authority is not known in the present case. Even considering these two orders passed under Customs Act, in which the appellant is one of the party and the present show cause notice having been issued on the same set of facts, we find the notice has been issued much after the time limit prescribed under Regulation 20 (1) of CBLR....