TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2014 (4) TMI 1124
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ndent. ORDER P.C. : The Appeal is filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zone Bench, Mumbai in Excise Appeal No. 146/2010. By the order passed on 16-1-2012 the CESTAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant. The appellant has pointed out that it was carrying on business from Plot No. D-128,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... knowledge of the appellants. 2. The appellants claim that their factory was closed with effect from 24-10-2000. They had surrendered their Central Excise Registration. A fresh registration was issued in the name of M/s. Narayan Dyeing from 9-1-2001. It is M/s. Narayan Dyeing who are ideally informed about the orders-in-original and not the appellants. Consequently, the CESTAT has seriously ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the appellants. The appellants claim that the order was passed by the CESTAT on 15-7-2008 remanding the matter to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). Before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), once again the issue was raised, but the said Commissioner found that the stand of the appellants is not supported and rather belied by the record. It is this finding of fact which has be....