Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (3) TMI 1031

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ENT This tax case revision has been filed, under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, challenging the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai, dated 9.5.2014, made in T.A.No.70 of 2006, relating to the assessment year 1988-89. 2. The brief facts of the case, necessary for the disposal of the appeal, are as follows: 2.1. The petitioner is a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e said Government Order. The claim made by the petitioner for concessional rate of tax had been disallowed in the assessment, dated 24.6.1998. The petitioner had filed a first appeal before the Joint Commissioner (CT) Appeals, Chennai. However, the demand order made against the petitioner had been confirmed by an order, dated 8.12.2005. Therefore, the petitioner had filed a second appeal challengi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ver, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal had committed an error in law, in holding that the petitioner was not entitled for the benefit of concessional rate of tax, under G.O.P.No.227, dated 3.3.1984. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had further submitted that the Tribunal had committed an error in law, in erroneously coming to the conclusion that the construction of the cabin was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he vehicles in question. The Tribunal had not considered the evidence on record in its proper perspective. The Tribunal had rendered a perverse finding that the vehicle is not eligible for the concessional rate of tax, even though only a cabin is built on the chassis. In such circumstances, this Court may be pleased to set aside the order passed by the Tribunal, dated 9.5.2014, in T.A.No.70 of 200....