Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (3) TMI 955

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 30A of the Constitution of India and in light of the order of this court dated 2.4.2014 passed in W.P.No.9496 of 2014. 2. The petitioner Company is engaged in generation of 105.66 MW electricity in the power plant of M/s Samalpatti Power Company Private Limited situated at Parandapalli Village, Pochampalli Taluk of Krishnagiri District. During the month of March 2014, a demand letter dated 28.03.2014 was issued by the 2nd respondent requiring the petitioner to deposit Service Tax for the period from January to March 2014 on the activity of generation of electricity. 3. The petitioner challenged the demand letter dated 28.03.2014 by way of a Writ Petition in W.P.No.9496 of 2014 before this court o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....red or brought before the Court for hearing. Inspite of filing the application for modification, even without waiting for orders of this court, the 1st respondent, simultaneously, issued the impugned show cause notice dated 12.10.2015 with entirely different allegations. The issuance of the 2nd show cause notice dated 12.10.2015 , contrary to the directions given by this Court in W.P.No.9496 of 2014, cannot be appreciated by this Court. 7. The respondent is bound by the orders, passed by this Court in W.P.No.9496 of 2014. In paragraph-4 of the order, this Court extracted the submissions, made by the learned counsel for the respondent, which reads as follows: "4. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the impugned order is o....