Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (1) TMI 75

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Tribunal dated 19.5.2006 except to the extent, the quantification of Excise Duty which remains payable by the appellant after allowing the relief has not been made the subject of a reasoned order by showing how the amount of duty has been calculated and consequently the amount of penalty is quantified. 2. We are of the opinion that this issue cannot be considered as a question of law at al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uty was made and the duty demand of raised at Rs.2,46,682 was reduced to Rs. 1,78,180/-. If the appellant is aggrieved with the arithmetical calculation of the computation of Duty, he could apply for the ratification of the mathematical mistake before the concerned authority. However, no appeal is to be entertained only for verifying arithmetical calculation. 3. Similarly, we find that penalty ....