2007 (8) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... During the scrutiny of the ER-1 return for April, 2004, it was detected that Cenvat credit was availed on the basis of the photocopy of the office copy of extra copy of invoices. 3. The adjudicating authority on the basis of the material on record found that the assessee never received the invoices in question or that they may have been lost before the goods said to be covered by them were received in the factory. It was, therefore, held that Cenvat credit was not allowable to the assessee. 4. The Appellate Commissioner held that the appellant had lost both copies of invoices i.e. 'original for the buyer' and 'duplicate for transporter' and it had filed the complaint about such loss with the Police. The learned Appellate Commissioner hel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of public documents of which they purport to be copies, as provided under Section 77 of the Evidence Act. The certified copies of public document can be issued as provided by Section 76 of the Evidence Act. Every public officer having the custody of a public document, which any person has a right to inspect, shall give that person on demand, a copy of it on payment of the legal fees therefor, together with a certificate written at the foot of such copy that it is a true copy of such document or part thereof, as the case may be, and such certificate shall be required to be dated and subscribed by such officer with his name and his official title, and is required to be sealed, whenever such officer is authorized by law to make use of a seal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder the rules about the nature and contents of the copies which are to be prepared; The transporter's copy has its own significance be cause the goods are carried under its cover and received in the factory through the transporter. 5.2 In this context, it will be noted that a full Bench of this Tribunal in CCE, New Delhi v. Avis Electronics Pvt. Ltd., reported in 2000 (117) E.L.T. 571 (Tribunal) has, in terms, held in paragraph 11 of the judgment that, the manufacturer was not authorized to avail the credit on the basis of a photocopy, which was impermissible. In para 8 of the judgment, it was held that insistence on document evidencing payment of duty on the inputs as prescribed by Rules was not a mere technicality to be complied with fo....