Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x was rightly payable by the respondent in regard to technical know how fee paid by it to French Company during the year 2002-03. The contention is that the said technical know-how fee attracted service tax as "Scientific and Technical Consultancy Service". 3. The submission of the ld. Counsel for the respondent is that the appeal does not context the finding of the Commissioner appeals) in para ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....viable on the Appellant." Ld. Counsel would point out that since the service agreement with the French Co. was of 1990 and service was rendered well before the introduction of service tax on "scientific or technical consultancy" service, there could be no tax demand at all, as the levy introduced in 2001 is prospective in its operation. It is also pointed out that the prospective nature of the le....