TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (2) TMI 795
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....see is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Chennai for the assessment year 2007-08. The issue in the appeal is with regard to treatment of income from deposits as income from business instead of income from other sources. 2. Brief facts are that during the financial year 2006-07 relevant to the assessment year 2007-08 the assessee has not carried on any busin....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....eal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) placing reliance on the judgement of Supreme Court in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT, cited supra, was of the view that interest income from bank deposits made from unused capital funds is assessable to tax under the head 'income from other sources', while all ex....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....fficer. Against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) assessee is in appeal before us. 3. Learned counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions made before the lower authorities. On the other hand, learned Departmental Representative strongly relied on the orders of the lower authorities. 4. We have heard both the parties and perused materials on record. In this case, inter....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rn interest and such interest will be chargeable under section 56. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) were of the view that the income earned by the assessee from bank deposits as income from other sources, which is fortified by the judgement of Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Monarch Tools Pvt. Ltd. (260 ITR 258) (SC). 5. In the case of Bongaigaon Refinery & ....