Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1990 (1) TMI 311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stion of law have been referred to this Court by the Tribunal under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961: "(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in rejecting the assessee's claim for weighted deduction in respect of the following items (i) Packing credit interest under s. 35B1) (b) (viii) 24,48,257 (ii) Part due/overdue interest on export under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mputing its total income ?" 2. The assessment year involved is the asst. yr. 1977-78 for which the relevant period of account is the year ending on 3rd July, 1976. 3. The first question is now concluded by the decision of this Court in the assessee's own case in respect of earlier year in the case Brook Bond India Ltd. vs. CIT (IT Ref. No. 13 of 1983 judgement delivered on 3rd Aug., 198....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....would involve a fresh investigation and enquiry over the entire facts and circumstances of the case. This is prohibited by the decision of the Supreme Court reported in Addl. CIT vs. Gurjargravuers P. Ltd. 1978 CTR (SC) 1: (1978) 111 ITR 1(SC) and is not contemplated to be permissible even by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in CIT vs. Gangaappa Cables Ltd. 1978 CTR (AP) 332: (1979) 116 ITR 778(AP) w....