2015 (3) TMI 1138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al is in appeal against the impugned order denying Cenvat credit on the input received by them. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacturer of copper, tube , rods, etc. To manufacture the final product, the appellant is required copper base. During the course of investigation it was found that two invoices were issued by the M/s. V.K. Enterprises where in the manufacturer's name i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d, penalty was also imposed. 2. The ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that they are the bona fide purchaser of the goods and goods have received by them duly entered in the statutory records. Further, they have produced the goods received transportation receipt that they have physically received it is an appropriate transaction. Therefore, they have correctly taken the Cenvat credit and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... have not been proved and they have taken Cenvat credit on the basis of invoices which are merely on paper transaction and goods received by them have not suffered any duty. Therefore, the impugned order is upheld. 4. Heard the parties, considered the submissions. 5. I have gone through the invoices, in the invoices manufacturer is shown as M/s. Navneet Yarn Pvt Ltd. and the product sh....