Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder Section 201 (1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') were set aside. 2. The Respondent Assessee, a private limited company incorporated in India, employs foreign nationals. The Respondent deducted tax on the salary paid to its employees and was depositing the same in accordance with the law.  Some of the expatriate employees of the Respondent, who were also in receipt of income from certain foreign companies, informed the Respondent company of such receipts of income in the month of March of the relevant financial year (1999-2000) and requested that tax be deducted thereon. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ('DCIT'), TDS Circle 23(1) by the order dated 16.11.2000 did not accept the explanation of the Respondent company for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rdingly interest in the sum of Rs. 12,87,078 on the short deduction of TDS was levied under Section 201 (1A) for the assessment year 2000-01. 4. Aggrieved by the orders dated 16.11.2000 and 16.7.2001 passed by the DCIT for the assessment year 1999-2000 and 2000-01 respectively, the Respondent company appealed to the CIT (A). By a common order dated 11.2.2002 the CIT (A) dismissed the appeals on the ground that the performance incentive was paid every year and was in the knowledge of the company. It was held that the TDS ought to have been deducted by the company on that basis. 5. The appeals filed thereafter by the Respondent company were allowed by the Tribunal by the impugned order dated 7.7.2006. The Tribunal held that the declarat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....any had itself paid interest on the short deduction of TDS for the period from 1988-89 to 1997-98 there was no reason for it to be subjected to a different treatment for the financial year in question. According to her the requirement of payment of interest on the short deduction was mandatory in terms of Section 201(1A) of the Act. 7. Appearing for the Assessee, Mr. M.S.Syali, learned senior Advocate submitted that as regards the financial year 1998-99, the information provided to the Respondent company by the expatriate employees under Section 192 (2) of the Act was received only in March 2000. It was not therefore possible to deduct the TDS earlier and, therefore, the Tribunal rightly held that for the said financial year the Responde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to be deducted would of the tax payable at the rates in force during that financial year ?on the estimated income of the Assessee? under the head salary for that financial year. The provision therefore envisages that the employer would proceed to deduct TDS on the estimate income. Where an Assessee is employed simultaneously under more than one employer, he is required to furnish to the employer responsible for deducting tax at source "such details of the income under the head 'salaries' due or received by him from the other employer." Section 192(2) further mandates that once that information is furnished "the person responsible for making payment referred to above shall take into account the details so furnished for the purposes of maki....