Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (2) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 stands concluded and decided against the Revenue vide decision dated 19th August, 2009 in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Spotking India Ltd. (2010) 324 ITR 283 (Del.). Learned counsel for the Revenue during the course of arguments had submitted that the CIT (Appeals) has recorded a finding that insurance claim was in respect of stock-in-trade. In case th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ct. Moreover, he did not record that the material/goods lost were raw material or unfinished goods. The tribunal in paragraph 4 of its order has specifically gone into the said aspect and referred to the query raised by the Assessing Officer and the written submission submitted by the assessee. We may note that the Assessing Officer had not held that the insurance claim was in respect of raw-mater....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stribution Expenses  Rs. 46,476/- Total Rs. 1,73,038/-   It is apparent that the assessee while disallowing Rs. 1,73,038/- has included the indirect expenses. We may note that the Assessing Officer in the assessment order has not gone into the direct and indirect expenses or commented about the deduction made suo motu by the assessee. The Assessing Officer applied Rule ....