2007 (12) TMI 474

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....04, dt. 25th Jan., 2007. The assessment year is 2000-01. 2. The appellant (sic'respondent) is a partnership firm doing civil engineering contracts and hotel business. For the asst. yr. 2000-01, the assessee admitted income from service charges amounting to ₹ 48,71,536 under the head income from the house property. In the earlier years, this income was assessed under other sources and th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bunal and the Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A). Hence the present appeal at the instance of the Revenue by formulating the question of law with the following effect : "Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that no penalty under s. 271(1)(c) was leviable in this case, as the assessee had challenged the Tribunal's order on merits f....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... should not be taxed as income from the house property. All the particulars regarding the service charges were duly furnished along with the return. Therefore, it could not be said that the assessee had furnished inaccurate particulars of income or concealed its income. The CIT(A) in his order has extracted the letter of the assessee dt. 12th Aug., 2004, and also recorded a finding that all the p....