2015 (5) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... MEMBER Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, AR For the Appellant Mr. Y. Sreenivasa Reddy, Advocate For the Respondent JUDGEMENT Per : ARCHANA WADHWA Being aggrieved with the order of Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he has upheld the order of original adjudicating authority dropping the demand against the assessee, Revenue has further filed the appeal before the Tribunal. 2. As per facts on record....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ommission and settled the matter. Thereafter they started paying duty on such excess recoveries on account of freight. 3. Subsequently realizing that the said excess freight recovered by them from their customers is not to form part of the assessable value, they filed the refund claims within the period of limitation. Such refund claims were sanctioned by the original adjudicating authority by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeal. 5. It stands brought to my attention by the learned advocate appearing for the respondents that the said decision of the Tribunal in the case of Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd. was challenged by the assessee before the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. The High Court in their decision reported as [2010 (252) E.L.T. 168 (Bom.)] set aside the same and remanded the matter to the Tribunal, with cert....