Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

Taxability on Ready Mix Concrate

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....axability on Ready Mix Concrate<br> Query (Issue) Started By: - Hiren Patel Dated:- 20-1-2016 Last Reply Date:- 20-1-2016 Central Excise<br>Got 1 Reply<br>Central Excise<br>In the case of M/s Larsen & Toubro Ltd. & Another, ECC Construction Group Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Hydrabad 2015 (10) TMI 612 - Supreme Court, SC has decided that RMC and CM are different product and thus RMC is n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot covered under notification no 4/1997 so it is liable for tax. So weather RMC made at site for the construction work of Bridge and road is taxable? Reply By CS RAHUL AGARWAL: The Reply: Hi, Going thru judgement, In simplex Infrastructure case wherein both tribunal as well as P&H HC have held RMC &CM to be same article and covered by the NN. 41/97, the SC have set aside both the order after pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onouncing its final observation. The relevant para 21 is reproduced for ready reference: In this backdrop, the only question is as to whether RMC manufactured and used at site would be covered by notification. Answer has to be in the negative inasmuch as Notification No. 4 dated March 01, 1997 exempts only &#39;Concrete Mix&#39; and not &#39;Ready Made Mixed Concrete&#39; and we have already held....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that RMC is not the same as CM. So, the apex court have clearly rule out that RMC manufactured at same site and used in same site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97. The simplex case where contrary view was taken has been remanded back to adjudicating authority to be decided in the light of SC pronouncement in instant case. The relevant para 24 read as: In the instant case, the CESTAT has held ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that as the RMC was manufactured at site and was used in construction work at site, the same was covered vide Notification No.41/97-CE. This view of the Tribunal has been upheld by the High Court thereby dismissing the appeal of the Revenue. Having regard to our discussion in the case of L&T, this view has to be rejected. we remit the case back to the adjudicating authority to look into the matter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... afresh from this angle, keeping in view our observations in this judgment. Hope it is cleared now. RCM & CM are different goods and RMC at site shall not be covered in NN. 41/97 liable to duty even manufactured at site of its use.<br> Discussion Forum - Knowledge Sharing ....