2015 (12) TMI 1436
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Prabhakar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. D. K. Sinha, A. C. (AR) ORDER Per : Ramesh Nair The Appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. 101/2004-MCH dated 01.04.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), New Custom House, Mumbai, wherein the Ld. Commissioner rejected the appeal in case of four imports under Bills of Entry No. 9811/25-3-99,....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t on the ground that the show cause notice was not issued and natural justice was denied to the appellant. Aggrieved, the revenue preferred appeal before the Tribunal; the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal and remanded the matter to Commissioner (Appeals). In the remand proceeding the Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order allowed the appeal in case of two Bills of Entry and rejected ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....idual product, not a standard product. Therefore, in case of this product, it is difficult to have a uniform price of rags which is having different characteristics, therefore merely by taking price of contemporaneous import without providing any documents, it is very difficult to ascertain that goods imported by the appellant and so called contemporaneous goods are same. Therefore, the enhancemen....
TaxTMI