Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 1221

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Income Tax Act,1961 (Act) challenges the order dated 8.8.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). 2. This appeal relates to Assessment Year 2006-07. The appellant- Revenue has formulated the following questions of law for our consideration:- "(1) Whether on the facts and circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal Mumbai "H" Bench Mumbai was justified in upholding ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssessment Year, the respondent had sold 24,300 shares of Micro Techno and 700 shares of Sacheta Metals. The respondent - assessee filed its return of income declaring total income of Rs. 1.66 lakhs. Thereafter a revised return of income was filed wherein the respondent offered long time capital gain of Rs. 60.52 lakhs for taxation in respect of which STT has not been paid. The Assessing Officer di....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r did not challenge the purchase of shares and therefore, it was not correct to hold that the said sale was not genuine. The CIT (Appeals) relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of "Mukesh R.Marolia Vs. ACIT" and deleted the addition made under Section 68 of the Act by the Assessing Officer. 5. On further appeal, the Tribunal by the impugned order dismissed the Revenue's appeal. ....