2015 (2) TMI 1086

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....AR) ORDER Per: P.K. Jain: The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots. A search was held on 24.09.2003. After the search, statement of Shri Ashok Fulwadhya, director of the appellant firm was recorded on 25.09.2003. In the statement, he admitted that certain goods have been cleared without payment of duty for which no documents have been....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d and a sum of `8 lakhs was demanded and the amount of `8 lakhs already deposited was appropriated against the said demand. The case was adjudicated wherein the said demand was confirmed in addition to equal amount of penalty under Section 11AC was imposed. A penalty of `2 lakhs was also imposed on Shri Ashok Fulwadhya and interest under Section 11AB was confirmed. Aggrieved by the said order, app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ain judgments. 3. Ld. AR reiterated the finding in the impugned order and stated that it is well settled law that admitted facts need not be proved. In the present case, the director in the appellants company have admitted and so called retraction was made only after three years and four months, and is therefore irrelevant. He also submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat they would have cleared 450 MT of ingots and duty liability on the same would be `8 lakhs and he further paid the duty after sometime. It was also clarified that they had to clear the goods without payment of duty as the customer wanted the goods at a cheaper rate. The statement was further corroborated by the statement of Shri Kishan G. Gadekar and Shri Chandu Singh. The said statement was re....