2015 (12) TMI 1098

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... T.K. Sikdar, Authorised Representative For the Respondent : Shri Deepak Kumar, Consultant ORDER Per: P.K. Das Heard both the sides and perused the records. 2. The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the Appellants supplied raw material to their sister unit who cleared the goods on payment of duty. The dispute relates to the under-valuation of the goods within inter unit ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... neutrality. On the other hand, the learned Counsel on behalf of the Respondent relied upon the various decisions including the decision of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court on the identical issue in favour of the Assessee. 4. We find that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra (supra) observed that the revenue neutrality would apply depending upon the facts of each case.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of facts are not disputed. The grievance was that the aspect of undervaluation has not been considered by the Tribunal at all. Grievance would have merited acceptance if the ultimate exercise would have benefited the Revenue by collection of duty in the coffers of the exchequer. In the facts of the present case, admittedly no such benefit accrues to the exchequer. In the circumstances, if the Tr....