Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (9) TMI 625

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aggrieved by an order dated 2-9-2005 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal'), New Delhi, Bench "G" in ITA No. 3144/Delhi/2002 relevant for the assessment year 1998-99. 2. By the order under appeal, the Tribunal set aside the penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer and upheld the view taken by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) ['(CIT A)'] to the eff....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g Officer added back the amount and also initiated the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. Subsequently the Assessing Officer issued a penalty order levying a penalty of ₹ 9,58,659 on the assessee. In the appeal filed by the assessee, the CIT(A) relied upon the several decisions to hold that merely because the assessee had voluntarily surrendered income to buy peace, ....