Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (1) TMI 50

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts are cleared on payment of Central Excise Duty. 2. During the period July 2001 to December 2003, the appellant brought back to its factory 6,566 nos. of duty paid gears, upon return from the market. Cenvat credit equivalent to the duty paid at the time of original clearance of these gears was taken in terms of Rule 16 of Central Excise Rules. Subsequently, after defect removal, the returned g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in as much as the appellant had not suppressed any facts. These contentions were rejected in adjudication as well as in first appeal. Hence, the present appeal. 5. I have perused records and heard both sides at length. 6. The appellant's contention that the case of 1902 returned gears was one of manufacture and clearance cannot find acceptance. The defective gears were brought for the purpo....