2015 (12) TMI 646

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S. Jain, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER Both the appeals are being disposed of by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by the authorities below. 2. After hearing both the sides duly represented by Ms. Saurabhi Sinha, Advocate and Shri S. Jain, DR for the respondent, we find that M/s. Sonal Enterprises imported cosmet....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rmed along with interest and identical amount of personal penalty. Penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- was imposed upon the Director. 5. The order passed by the original adjudicating authority was confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Hence, the present appeal. 6. The appellant have taken a categorical stand that the goods were purchased on stock lot basis and at the transaction value ref....