Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (12) TMI 423

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he 1st respondent to forbear from initiating any recovery action pursuant to the proceedings dated 14.8.2014, 11.8.2014, 29.04.2014 and 30.10.2014 respectively, pending disposal of A.P. Nos.156, 155, 83 of 2014 and 12 of 2015 by the 2nd respondent herein. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, originally, challenging the assessment orders of the 1st respondent for the years TNGST.0802250/2003-04 and 2004-05 and TIN 33410802250/2006-07 and 2011-12 respectively, appeals were filed along with stay applications by the petitioner by remitting mandatory deposit of 25% of the tax demanded for all the assessment years before the Joint Commissioner (CT) Appeals, Chennai. The appeals were taken on file along with stay petitions fi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d to the Bankers to recover the balance of tax. The petitioner has filed again stay extension applications in all the aforesaid appeals on 14.10.2015. On 19.10.2015, the petitioner addressed the 1st respondent, drawing his attention to the fact that the 2nd respondent had already reserved orders in the appeals and they have also filed extension of stay applications on 14.10.2015 itself. However, the same are yet to be heard and disposed of. 5. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner requested the 1st respondent not to initiative any coercive steps, since they have filed stay extension applications, however, the 1st respondent has orally informed the petitioner that unless final orders in the appeals or stay ex....