Home / 
2010 (9) TMI 1077
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....DR), for the respondent JUDGEMENT Per P.G. Chacko This matter arises for mention on the maintainability of the appeal. But there is no representation for the appellant despite notice. The learned JDR submits that this appeal is not maintainable by virtue of the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The proviso shows that no appeal shall lie to the appellate ....