2015 (11) TMI 1378

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Mr. T Pramod Kumar Chopda, in all W.Ps Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Seeking to quash the impugned order passed by the respondent in Pan Nil dated 25.09.2015 under Sections 271(1)(b) and 27(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act respectively and the impugned order in New Case/2007-2008 dated 17.03.2015, the petitioner is before this Court with these writ petitions. 2. Heard th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....'s father submitted a reply dated 27.01.2015, in which, he explained that the property belongs to eight persons. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - I(1), Thanjavur accepted the explanation of the petitioner's father and dropped his proposal. Now, the grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent issued the impugned orders thereby levying penalty against the petitioner, despite the relief ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as far as the other owners are concerned, is one and the same, the petitioner's claim alone cannot be rejected. Without considering the said aspects, the respondent has passed the impugned orders. Hence, to give a quietus to this issue, in the interest of justice, the impugned assessment orders challenged in these writ petitions are liable to be interfered with. 7. Accordingly, the impugne....