Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (11) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Haryana in Central Excise Appeal No 180 of 2005. The Hon'ble High Court has directed the Tribunal as under :- "Question still remains as to whether non-payment of duty at the time when it was due, was on account of fraud, collusion or wilful misstatement or suppression of facts or contravention of the provisions of the act or the rules with intent to evade payment of duty as laid down under Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... It is submitted that, in the absence of any wrong intention, proviso to Section 11A read with Rule 13(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, are not applicable in this case. It is also his submission that during the relevant period, they had availed credit on almost 250 bills of entry, out of which this error was committed only in respect of 4 bills of entry. 3.The learned DR submits that the fact is not d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ific query from the Bench, the learned DR submits that not a single statement of any person was recorded to indicate that the excess amount of credit availed by the appellant was with intention to avail ineligible credit. In the absence of any such evidence, it is not possible to accept that the appellant had availed the excess credit with intention to evade payment of duty. In order to appreciate....