2015 (11) TMI 519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Shri J.P. Khaitan (Sr.Advocate) & Miss Sanjukta Gupta (Ad) For the Respondent : Shri S.S. Charterjee, Suptd (AR) ORDER Per Shri H.K.Thakur This stay application has been filed by the appellant for staying the operation of OIO No. 13/CE/Commr./Kol-VI/2011 dt 31/3/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise Kolkata-VI. Under this OIO Adjudicating authority has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) against an order passed by the Adjudicating authority. That the present demand decided by the Commissioner was as a result of finalization of the classification. Learned Advocate made the bench go through Para- 3.3.1, & 3.4.1 & 4.9 & 4. of the Adjudication order dt 31/3/2011 to argue that it was brought to the notice of the Adjudicating authority that appellant intend to challenge the classifica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n stay application. The issue involved in there proceeding is whether demand of duty based on earlier order dt 31/3/93, passed by Assistant Commissioner finalizing the classification / rate of duty of the products manufactured by the appellant when the same was sad aside & remanded by CESTAT. Second issue raised by the appellant is that the Adjudicating authority was not justified in re deciding t....