2013 (11) TMI 1579

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....IL FOR THE RESPONDENT : ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON, SMT.MEERA V.MENON, SRI.MAHESH V.MENON JUDGMENT Manjula Chellur, C.J. The above revisions pertain to different assessment years of the respondent assessee. The respondent assessee runs a rice mill and assessment came to be completed levying purchase tax under Section 5A of the Kerala Government Sales Tax Act on purchase of paddy. As ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se in which case reference was made to Peekay Re-rolling Mills (P) Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner [(2007) 6 VST 541 (SC)]. Referring to this decision of the Apex Court Tribunal opined, levying purchase tax was illegal. Aggrieved by the same, the State is before this Court in the above revisions pertaining to different assessment years. 3. The law relied upon by the Tribunal is incorrect as the f....