2015 (10) TMI 272

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cate (Proxy) For the Respondent : Ms. Indira Sisupal, AC (AR) ORDER Per R. Periasami Vide this Tribunal's MISC Order No.40718/2015 dt. 6.5.2015, the appellant was directed to predeposit Rs. 25 lakhs within a period of 4 weeks and compliance was posted on 15.6.2015. Subsequently, the matter was fixed on 3.8.2015 and the learned Advocate Shri H.S. Hredai appeared and informed the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....and the appellants not compiled the High Court order she submits that the Tribunal order got merged with the Hon'ble High Court order. 4. After hearing from both sides, we find that this Bench vide Misc Order No.40718/2015 dt. 6.5.2015 ordered predeposit of Rs. 25 lakhs against total penalty of Rs. 52,56,555/- imposed on the appellant by the adjudicating authority. The Hon'ble High Cour....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rms of Section 28 (1) and 28AB of Customs Act, 1962 read with relevant Notification No.43/2002-Cus. dated 19.04.2002 Notification No/91/2004-Cus. dated 10.9.2004 as applicable, upon redemption, if any allowed by the adjudicating authority. v) penalty should not be imposed on them under Section 114A and 112 of Customs Act, 1962". 9. We find that the plea of the appellant that no penalty shoul....