2014 (4) TMI 1076
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....te General, Haryana, for the respondents. JUDGMENT The appellant has approached this court under section 36 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, "the Act") against the order dated May 30, 2013 (Annexure P10) which was amended by corrigendum (Annexure A11) on August 6, 2013. The appellant was required to deposit a sum of Rs. 4,82,480 as additional demand including interest of Rs. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e date of payment of first instalment. The appellant being dissatisfied against the order dated July 24, 2007, filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the same was also dismissed by the Tribunal vide order dated May 30, 2013. 2. Feeling aggrieved against the orders dated July 24, 2007 as well as May 30, 2013 (as amended on August 6, 2013), the appellant has filed the present appeal. 3.&nbs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... learned counsel for the appellant was directed to seek instructions whether the appellant is ready to deposit a sum of Rs. 2 lacs as condition precedent for hearing of the appeal before the Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad. Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view the stringent financial condition of the appellant, the appellant shall manage to deposit Rs. ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI