2015 (9) TMI 299
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....a, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondent though served. 2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 14-11-2006 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai ["Tribunal" for short] in Appeal No. E/957-959, 962-963, 972, 992-93 of 2000, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-in-appeal dated 21-12-1999 allowed the appeal by setting aside the order-in-original. Being aggrieved with the same, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Tribunal, who vide its order allowed the appeal and confirmed the order-in-appeal. Against the said order of the Tribunal, the appellant has preferred the present appeal. 4. The amount of excise duty involved in this appeal is be....
TaxTMI