Home / 
2015 (9) TMI 298
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....BKV, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel ORDER The appellant is aggrieved by an order of CESTAT dated 17th November, 2014 which requires him to deposit of Rs. 50 lacs being the differential amount as a precondition for the hearing of the appeal. Learned counsel contends that the appellant has a prima facie case. It is stated that the mater....
TaxTMI