2015 (8) TMI 1178
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....dent, no one appears on behalf of the respondent. 2. While admitting this appeal on 23-6-2009, the Court had formulated the following substantial questions of law : "1. Whether non-accountal of manufactured goods and raw material in statutory registers i.e. RG1 and RG23, is in violation of Rules 173G(4), 173H, 173H(2)(a) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppeals). These orders were challenged by the assessee before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has set aside the demand of Central Excise Duty to the tune of Rs. 23,270/- on raw material and has also reduced the penalty from Rs. 54,688/- to Rs. 2,000/- each, whereas the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was affirmed. The order of the CESTAT is challenged by the Revenue in this tax a....