2011 (5) TMI 909

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner : A.P. Mathur For the Respondent : S.S.C., B.K.S. Raguvanshi ORDER This is an appeal against the order dated 26.2.2004 passed by the Tribunal whereby the appellants' application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal was dismissed. The first question, therefore, for consideration is whether the order of the Tribunal insofar as dismissing the application seeking co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cause shown by the appellants that they were representing against the matter has no force and no cause has been shown to condone the delay, hence the delay condonation application is rejected. Once there be a quasi-judicial order, the remedy of a party is to seek the remedy available under the Act, in this case, an appeal before the Tribunal. By merely writings to the authority who had passed ....