Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (8) TMI 591

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 2006 Appellant Ms. P.L. Bansal Respondent Dr. Rakesh Gupta ORDER 1. The revenue is aggrieved by an order dated 29-4-2005 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "F" in ITA No. 5568 Delhi of 2004 relevant for the assessment year 2001-02. 2. The Assessing Officer disallowed commission payment made by the Assessing Officer (sic) to three parties, that is Sh. Rajesh S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of services rendered by it as per its letter dated 11-10-2003 in response to summons issued by the Assessing Officer under section 131 of the Income-tax Act. M/s. Rajesh Traders also appears to have been given a copy of the accounts of the assessee as maintained in its books of account. 6. Insofar as M/s. Jagdish Rai Jai Bhagwan is concerned, the assessee furnished a copy of the accounts of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s under section 131 of the Income-tax Act in response to which necessary information was filed. 9. The Tribunal took a view that the fact that the assessee was not in a position to produce the two commission agents is not its fault and the Assessing Officer could have exercised powers available to him to summon and cross-examine these two parties if, for some reason, he did not accept the state....