2015 (8) TMI 559

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Ms. Sweta Ghatak, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Smita Das De, Advocate JUDGMENT I. P. Mukherji J.- The concerned assessment year is 2011-12. There is a demand from the Income-tax Department upon the assessee-writ petitioner for a sum of Rs. 12,11,86,487. Against the assessment order in question, the assessee's appeal before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) is pending. By a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ach has been made before the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax regarding which there is no response till date. On September 10, 2014, the order dated July 17, 2014, was "annulled". Mr. J. P. Khaitan, learned senior advocate for the petitioner, tries to unfold the prima facie case of the assessee to show that the demand ex facie is unjust. To a substantial extent he has been able to establish ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....verted into 22 carats upon addition of alloy was in fact of only 22 carats. It is nobody's case that that particular quantity of the gold was further converted into gold of lesser carat value. The addition of Rs. 26,35,09,093 made on the said basis is prima facie erroneous. Therefore, in my opinion, the writ petitioner has a substantial case to be tried before the Commissioner (Appeals). Afte....