Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (7) TMI 894

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Respondent : Mr. R.B. Mathur ORDER BY THE COURT:- This writ petition has been filed limited to the extent of seeking the quashing of the condition of the order dated 14th November, 2011 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board in the petitioner's stay application in Appeal No. 2118/2011 directing that in respect of the allegedly short paid tax and interest by the petitioner Assessee even tho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....shing a security for the sum in dispute by way of submitting a bond in VAT Form 64 along with two sureties acceptable to the authorised officer as per the provisions of Rule 77 of Rules, 2006. 3. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Rajasthan Tax Board taking into view the provisions of Rule 77 of Rules, 2006, in similar matters while staying recovery of VAT short paid and interest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....instead of a solvent security as required under the Rule 77 Rajasthan VAT Rules, 2006. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the writ petition including the impugned order. 5. Mr. R.B. Mathur counsel for the respondent has raised objections with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition, which to my mind are without substance inasmuch as the petitioner in the writ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....by the learned counsel for the petitioner detailing the gross arbitrariness and discriminatory treatment by the Tax Board in dealing with the interim application of the petitioner and requiring bank guarantee vis-a-vis the approach of the Board in other similar matter wherein the Board required only solvent security under Rule 77 of Rules, 2006 to cover the interest of the Revenue in the event the....