2013 (3) TMI 619
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Respondent. ORDER We have heard Mr. P. J. Saikia, learned counsel, appearing for the writ petitioner, and Mr. R. Dubey, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents. None has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 6. 2. The petitioner No. 2 has been assessed by the Assessing Officer making the petitioner liable to pay service tax in respect of the execution of some works contract, w....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t stay of the assessment order has been made by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, who is the appellate authority. 5. In the above background, the petitioner, now, claims that the ONGC has received a notice, dated 6-2-2013, under Section 87 of the Finance Act, 1994, from the respondent No. 3 herein for recovery of a sum of Rs. 23,89,097/- (assessed service tax + penalty al....
TaxTMI