2013 (10) TMI 1338

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... M. Saxena, for the petitioner. The matter comes up in sales tax revision under section 86 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 (Act of 1994) against the judgment dated June 7, 2007 passed by the Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, in Appeal No. 203/2006. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The Rajasthan Tax Board, Ajmer, has upheld the finding of the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Commercial ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Bajaj Electricals Ltd. [2008] 18 VST 436 (SC); [2009] 1 SCC 308, where the honourable Supreme Court has held the notification dated March 22, 2002 amending section 78(5) of the Act of 1994 was clarificatory and therefore, retrospective in nature. She submits that in this view of the matter any breach of law in respect of the transit of goods on January 8, 2001 would be covered by the said notifica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot accompanied by the said form. For this reference can be made to the judgment of the honourable Supreme Court in the case of State of Rajasthan v. D. P Metals [2001] 124 STC 611 (SC); [2002] 1 SCC 279. In view of the submissions made, even while dismissing the sales tax revision it is clarified that the order of the Rajasthan Tax Board passed on June 7, 2007 upholding the order dated May 27, ....