Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (8) TMI 357

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the ld. Assessing Officer ("AO") is bad in law and void ab-initio." 3. At the time of hearing before us, it is stated by the learned counsel for the assessee that this ground is of general nature and should be treated as not pressed. Accordingly, the same is rejected being not pressed. 4. Ground No.2 of the assessee's appeal reads as under:- "That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. AO/Ld. DRP has erred in applying tax rate of 15 per cent on 'Fee for technical services' ("FTS") under Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA on training services rendered by the appellant, ignoring the fact that section 115A of the Act provides for beneficial tax rate of 10% (exclusive of surcharge/cess) on FTS." 5. At the time ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er submitted that the assessee has a PE in India and, therefore, Section 115A is not applicable in the case of the assessee. 7. In the rejoinder, it is stated by the learned counsel that the decision of Goetze (India) Ltd. (supra) relied upon by the learned DR would not be applicable because the above decision was with regard to the claim of some expenses which was made by the assessee before the Assessing Officer without filing the revised return. In that context, Hon'ble Apex Court held that the assessee ought to have filed the revised return for making any additional claim of expenses. That in this case, the assessee is not claiming any additional expenses but assessee is only disputing the rate of tax. The rate of tax applied by the As....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pute is with regard to the rate of tax and the assessee rightly pointed out that the issue of rate of tax arose only after the receipt of the assessment order. Moreover, it is the duty of the Assessing Officer to charge the tax at the correct rate. Therefore, in our opinion, the assessee can agitate for the first time before the ITAT the issue regarding the rate of tax in respect of fee for technical services. 9. Section 90, sub-section (2) reads as under:- "(2) Where the Central Government has entered into an agreement with the Government of any country outside India or specified territory outside India, as the case may be, under sub-section (1) for granting relief of tax, or as the case may be, avoidance of double taxation, then, in rel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x rate of 10% in respect of fees for technical services. This being a more beneficial provision than the Article 12 of DTAA, therefore, assessee had a right to claim the applicability of this provision of the Income-tax Act in view of the provision of Section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act. We, therefore, direct the Assessing Officer to apply Section 115A(BB) and tax the fees for technical services at the rate of 10%. 12. Ground No.3 reads as under:- "That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. AO has erred in not granting credit for tax deducted at source ('TDS') amounting to Rs. 36,98,688 while issuing notice under section 156 of the Act read with the assessment order under section 143(3)/144C(13) of the Act.....